Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
SK7000 said: Now I am the one lost here. Can you elaborate on what you mean? The method for viewing and communicating between what concepts?
I am not too fond on the idea of a "best collective view," though. There are many ways of looking at the world, and chances are you are not the only one who sees it in a particular way. I don't think there is any "best" out there, though I like being exposed to as many view-points as possible. Learning more might not change my stance on things, but I still like learning about the different ways that people look at life.
Consider how we can discuss a topic. How would you explain me your views? That's as simple as I can break it down. We can all make interesting analogies but it'd be easier if we use a general model for it (web/spiders etc).
Example zealot
There's a devout christian in the group hellbent on his/her views. How would he/she try to understand this if his reference bundle doesn't include buddhist fews? An analogy to nature could do the trick. And seeing as we can remove it from context it will avoid discussion as "But the bible said" VS "But science said". And we can just convert that to: "Well we got these 2 views here on the question what happened to the dinosaurs "Let's put them near science and outside vision range for the bible group". (That was an example, Please ignore the assumption about the dinosaurs, I'm explaining something not soulcrushing your beliefs or religion. If I did you'd know for 110% sure >_>)
Secondarily I was consdering the use of the thread to others than us actually. If we can share our views in a neutral and quick manner the continuity of the thread becomes more stable and other people may be more tempted to share their views instead of holding back in fear of being chastised about referencing their own background.
Or we could just go back to everybody throwing a list of what he she thinks and debate each point one by one :) I don't mind myself but I was considering some more aspects than just what I wanted here.
Best collective view
Best collective view was what I considered when we all work on something here and put it into the model idea. And let it go from there with the input of potential future others. I didn't mean bending your own beliefs to get some happy collective as first of all people can never truly understand each other as if seeing through their eyes nor should they be willing to buckle to peer pressure. It is far healthier to understand such decisions than to blindly accept that it is for a group effort and will benefit that person without him/her actually understanding why he/she just changed his/her beliefs.
Did this satisfactorily answer your question? If not I'd be more than glad to clear things up further. I'm in no hurry.
Mnessie
almost 12 years agoExample zealot
(That was an example, Please ignore the assumption about the dinosaurs, I'm explaining something not soulcrushing your beliefs or religion. If I did you'd know for 110% sure >_>)
Secondarily
I was consdering the use of the thread to others than us actually. If we can share our views in a neutral and quick manner the continuity of the thread becomes more stable and other people may be more tempted to share their views instead of holding back in fear of being chastised about referencing their own background.
Or we could just go back to everybody throwing a list of what he she thinks and debate each point one by one :) I don't mind myself but I was considering some more aspects than just what I wanted here.
Best collective view
Did this satisfactorily answer your question? If not I'd be more than glad to clear things up further. I'm in no hurry.