BattlequeenYume said:
I doing that to point such user out. Bc you mods have so much to do and I thought it would be helpful. But if you don't want me to comment such things, I will stop that of course. :3
Maybe, after sending the user a warning, the mod decided to delete the comment to avoid "flooding".
In that regard, I, sometimes, delete my own comment after the problem/tag/... is solved, to avoid thing as non-related comment.

Edit: regarding the post #271991, The user Ant changed so many rating with panty, ...to safe so.
I 100% didn't delete it either.

Also, thank you Shizko for pointing this user out. I'll...have to reprimand them.
I didn't delete it.

A while back, I considered deleting a comment like that which was directed at a member with only one edit in their history. But I didn't then either.
I have noticed quite a few people have been messing with the ratings though. In a detrimental and trolling way. I don't know why we're having more frequent occurrences of that kind of activity.
Yeah i mean considering that anyone that has a registered account could change anything regarding an upload whether its Rating or Tags is definitely an issue, then again i don't know if i should take this to the Site Suggestions forum but perhaps after a post gets approved by a moderator the tags and rating cant be meddled with again?
BattlequeenYume said:
Why are getting my comments deleted when I ask someone to stop set the rating false? (Don't know where to put that so I just choose this tread)
I took the comment out after going through ant's change histroy. Else I'd have to warn you for backseat modding lest it encourage others. I'm not saying to stop, just that I have to tidy up after it's resolved.
Okay just wanted to know if it's pleased or not.
Now I know that you cleaned up after taking care it's totally fine.
Post #273337

Doesn't the rotation fits for the image?
She is lying on the bed and I would say it's fits better then other posts.
I did not moderate post #273337, however I agree that it is an obvious rotation, she looks like she is falling away from the bed by the perspective.
Hmm okay if you say so.

I don't see that. Should looking more closely then.
BattlequeenYume said:
Post #273337

Doesn't the rotation fits for the image?
She is lying on the bed and I would say it's fits better then other posts.
It was mostly about the writing. It was sideways.
Does any moderator agrees undelete post #271955?, although it is smaller than the parent, is a revision in this place.
Emmy: re post #275033 deleted for excess jpeg artifacts.

The Character herself look fine - the pleats in the skirt are crisp and the outline is reasonably clean, the scenic landscape background is drawn in a water color style, which works well for this image. I don't see excessive artifacts. I don't see any serious blocking, or quantization. The clouds, which often show artifacts look fine.

This is the kind of image that makes an interesting wallpaper, more so than the typical closeup images usually posted.
Her hair, clothing, and bag are covered in extremely obvious artifacting.

And when I can clearly see them (what with my shite vision), then ya know there's too many.
It's a composite of two images that have exaserabted the artefacts that were probably already on the girl.

I can clean them up, but it'll be nearly ~28h before I get time.
SciFi said:
It's a composite of two images that have exaserabted the artefacts that were probably already on the girl.

I can clean them up, but it'll be nearly ~28h before I get time.
Then we'll only need to transfer votes.

No rush though.
Just wanted to say something to the conversation on post #275602

Your text of reason for deletion was make me think of this conclusion. I don't know if it's just me (I'm just a confused person sometimes) or another text would be better for understanding.
Talking about the text: "replaced with non Twitter version"
Okay, I figured out why we're both getting confused.

The image of Borr that was posted on Twitter WAS in PNG format already. I didn't alter the image at all. So, technically, in this case, you did indeed upload a duplicate. That's why it didn't need to be replaced. It was the exact same image.
Post #270205

Why was it deleted?
I don't understand the deleting reason *tos*.

Edit: All of his works were deleted?
All of kinoebi's images have been deleted by Aleron suggesting that the artist requested that his work be removed from Konachan.
Ah, what a shame. It happens sometimes though. We actually host lots of images created by artists who don't want their work on image boards. I suppose we get away with it because they haven't noticed us. Yet.

Edit: Although I did just notice that Kinoebi's art is still on Danbooru, so...hm....
That's really sad. His work is always so sensual and lovely.
Will miss his images here.
There was a take down request filed for Konachan. It doesn't affect Gelbooru or sites maintianed by different admins. The artist will have to contact them seperately.
Post #261525

Reason: dmca.
Wouldn't it be better when not shortcuts would be used for understanging?
Personally, I think it’s stupid to flat out up your artwork and not expect others redistribute it. But that’s besides the point. This is kinda sad since kinoebi has good artwork
BattlequeenYume said:
Reason: dmca.
Wouldn't it be better when not shortcuts would be used for understanding?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Some artists will only take down from sites where it's unattributed, others would rather people visited their sites or pateron because they either want all the traffic or don't want to devalue the pateron rewards.

It's their work, it's their choice. We have to respect that else the artists and those that are good with sources will go elsewhere.
If you think about it, whenever someone uploads something from Patreon (or whatever other paid service), they're basically stealing.