Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
I did write that WAY back before I even know about the .net domain for Konachan. However:
Your avatar can be questionable, but only borderline safe-questionable. eg. cleavage.
More or less covers the issue you bring up. I leave cleavage alone, but if I see panties, I change the avatar (usually I just shift the avatar or just crop out the panties. I don't outright kill the avatar for being Q, unlike what all staff does for E avatars.)
If people/user are smart, they'd err on the side of caution instead of purposely riding the line, so to speak.
It's either that or we mandate nothing but SAFE avatars to avoid the issue altogether in writing. As much as I like to give SOME leeway, I'm against trying to explain every little detail in the rules/policies. I'd rather stick to short and succint, if possible. Too much text and people start to TL;DR. (Not that they don't do that NOW, but that's another issue...)
StahnAileron
about 11 years ago- Your avatar can be questionable, but only borderline safe-questionable. eg. cleavage.
More or less covers the issue you bring up. I leave cleavage alone, but if I see panties, I change the avatar (usually I just shift the avatar or just crop out the panties. I don't outright kill the avatar for being Q, unlike what all staff does for E avatars.)If people/user are smart, they'd err on the side of caution instead of purposely riding the line, so to speak.
It's either that or we mandate nothing but SAFE avatars to avoid the issue altogether in writing. As much as I like to give SOME leeway, I'm against trying to explain every little detail in the rules/policies. I'd rather stick to short and succint, if possible. Too much text and people start to TL;DR. (Not that they don't do that NOW, but that's another issue...)