It's very sad. I just saw that these tags exist and thought that they could be applied.

Pashok11 said:
It's very sad. I just saw that these tags exist and thought that they could be applied.

Awh, don't be sad. I think it's cool when people wanna help tag. You just gotta be sure to use pre-existing tags.

otaku_emmy said:
Awh, don't be sad. I think it's cool when people wanna help tag. You just gotta be sure to use pre-existing tags.

I just seed that you have removed some of my tags. I'm don't understand why and really confused about that. I wanna help but now don't know how.

Basically do what I said. Only add tags that we're already using. You created several new tags.

We're not a board that gets very specific with tags the way, say, Danbooru does. Our tags are extremely simple.

otaku_emmy said:
Basically do what I said. Only add tags that we're already using. You created several new tags.

We're not a board that gets very specific with tags the way, say, Danbooru does. Our tags are extremely simple.

I'm saying about something like hair color. I know that takanashi_kiara has an orange_hair, why you deleted it and add red_hair?

Pashok11 said:
I'm saying about something like hair color. I know that takanashi_kiara has an orange_hair, why you deleted it and add red_hair?

We base that sort of thing on what the image is actually showing. Different artists won't always stick to the original design. Lighting often affects things like hair color as well.

We don't tag for multi color hair either, as I noticed you adding blue_hair for Gura.

Any objections to adding a tag implication for bodysuit to skintight? The current wiki definition for bodysuit does specify "a form-fitting garment (tight clothing that molds into the shape of your body when worn)".

Currently, about 46% of posts tagged bodysuit are also tagged skintight. And, looking through the -skintight bodysuit posts, most are either skintight or should not have been tagged bodysuit.

Any thoughts?

I think it'd be a good implication to make.

Although, we would have to consider things like spacesuits. They're rare, but...we do have a few posts like that on here. Those definitely aren't tight.

The reason I asked originally was because some bodysuits are much tighter than others. Like, vacuum sealed onto the body (versus Eva plugsuits which are kinda just "form-fitting"). For some images it's obviously meant to be more...tantalizing, almost to the point of it being latex fetish wear.

otaku_emmy said:
Although, we would have to consider things like spacesuits.

Do we want to change the wiki for bodysuit to include spacesuits? The current definition wouldn't include them. I was counting those among the cases of incorrect tagging.

Hmmmmmmmmmm. That's a good point. They're "suits", but they're not really "bodysuits".

I agree with the latter part of your post. I have changed my mind. Those shouldn't be included with things like plug suits/latex wear or the stocking-type bodysuits.

Re: Comments on post #343177

The nopan tag is already being used far more loosely than was originally intended.

nopan comes with the expectation that the character should be wearing panties, as such when there is no expectation that the character should be wearing panties, the tag nopan does not apply

However, it seems it's being applied to any and all posts without panties so long as the nude tag does not apply. It has essentially become a replacement for the missing "bottomless" tag.

We do have topless, so my first choice would be to add a "bottomless" tag. But someone would need to go through the 7650 nopan posts, tagging "bottomless" and removing "nopan" where appropriate...

Otherwise, we could just continue to use "nopan" as our "bottomless" tag, updating the wiki to reflect that. This is the easy (no work) solution which we may have to settle for, but I personally don't care for it.

I'm glad you got where I was coming from. Sometimes I feel like it's hard for me to articulate the points I'm trying to make.

I would rather we have a "bottomless" tag as well, tbh. I'm reading Danbooru's "bottomless" tag wiki right now, and they use the tag in pretty much the way I was talking about. "Nude from the waist down".

I'm kinda a freak so I wouldn't necessarily mind going through all those posts...

I have a bit spare time these days, so I could help Emmy to change the tags.

They're pretty easy to differentiate so it wouldn't be hard. It'd just take a while. Danbooru's wiki is a pretty straightforward guide.

So I guess we'll do that.

I just noticed sideboob and underboob tags don't implicate breasts, you have to add it manually. Maybe we should add an implication?

Yeah, I think about that from time to time. You're probably right about the need for the implication. I've just been kinda adding it manually when necessary.

Edit: bottomless tagging completed (to the best of our ability), and a wiki entry has been created (based on Danbooru's guidelines).

Thanks to Yume for her help.

We are following artist tags from Danbooru or not?
Few artist tags need to rename according to official or current used.

Arsy said:
We are following artist tags from Danbooru or not?
Few artist tags need to rename according to official or current used.

You wanna make me a list or something? I can double check and change them.

Edit: Although, sometimes the tag Danbooru uses doesn't make sense. Take the artist Nian for example. We use "nian" but they use "nian_(zhanian)". Nowhere on any links listed for that artist does it say "zhanian" so I'm less inclined to change OUR tag.

Here artists tags need to rename, but I'm sure there more than this.

yuuuuu to amagasa_yun
Been used for over 3 years.

shimashima08123 to re:shimashima (re:しましま)
https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/fsr/=/keyword_creater/"Re:しましま"
Been used for over 3 years.

mukatsukulsp to muka_tsuku (ム菓ツク))
https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/fsr/=/keyword_creater/"ム菓ツク"
Been used for over 2 years.

icarus_(632247131) icarus_(artist) to goumudan
Been used for over 2 years.

tokkihouse to myabit
https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/fsr/=/keyword_creater/"myabit"
Been used for over 2 years.
Danbooru using "tokkihouse" for unknown reason.

yuzu_modoki to yuzuka (柚夏)
Been used for over 2 years.

Looks like there no information in artists wiki, probably few bad user remove them.

otaku_emmy said:
Edit: Although, sometimes the tag Danbooru uses doesn't make sense.

Agree. Danbooru using twitter username (@*****) or pixiv handlename (/stacc/*****) as "temporary" tags until they know romanized name or official name.

i fixed the ones that need fixing. I won't be changing the last two.

Thanks.
But why? The last two come from pixiv, dlsite, Melonbooks (柚夏) and it's official.

Cuz those match Danbooru. And Yuzuka in particular is very generic.

The wiki for original currently lists "Sayori's Chocola and Vanilla" as examples of original characters. This is incredibly outdated and should be changed. Any suggestions for characters to list in their place?

Nekojira's character Thea comes to mind. Then there's Plushmallow. I'm not sure who she belongs to but she is all original. There's also Otokuyou's Ringo-chan.

Kantoku has a lot of original characters as well. For example kurumi_(kantoku) and shizuku_(kantoku).

Yeah, those are classics.

Should we change honkai_impact to honkai_(series)?

Using the fate_(series) tag as reference, I suggest we use both the honkai_impact copyright tag and honkai_(series) circle tag.

For characters like herta_(honkai:_star_rail) we can use honkai:_star_rail instead of honkai_impact + the series tag. Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I have no knowledge of the Honkai series (⌒_⌒;)

Yeah, you're right. Honkai Impact is a specific game within the franchise and since Star Rail is coming out I figured maybe we need to change the tags to reflect that. It's very similar to how you said we treat Fate stuff.

Need to rename: igakusei to igayan (いがやん)
Same tags with Booru.